Clinics' Pitch to Indian Émigrés: It's a Boy
The pitch could not be more direct. The intended audience could
not be more specific.
"Desire a Son?" asked
an advertisement in recent editions of India Abroad, a weekly newspaper for
Indian expatriates in the United States and Canada.
"Choosing
the sex of your baby: new scientific reality," declared another in the
same publication. A third ad ran in both India Abroad and the North American
edition of The Indian Express. "Pregnant?" it said. "Wanna know
the gender of your baby right now?"
Some people would
call it niche marketing an effort by companies to promote their products
to one of the country's fastest-growing ethnic groups.
But
the products in question are not chewing gum or financial services. They are
procedures to preselect the sex of a child or, in the case of one advertiser,
to identify the sex of the fetus as early as five weeks into a pregnancy. And
the target market is immigrants from India, where sex-determination tests were
outlawed seven years ago in a still unsuccessful effort to thwart the widespread
practice of aborting female fetuses.
Such ads would be
illegal in India, which has struggled for years to discourage women from exploiting
medical technology to assure themselves of giving birth to boys. Now, Indians
in the United States and Canada find themselves being courted by American companies
that promise to help do just that.
It is a strange twist
on the usual immigrant tug of war between old customs and new choices, the wrinkle
being that new freedoms may help perpetuate an age-old preference for boys.
To be singled out as a market for sex-selection procedures
distresses many Indian-Americans. So does the casual merchandising of techniques
that claim to increase the odds of having a male child. The subject is so sensitive
and so evocative of painful debates about free choice and abortion back
in India that India Abroad abruptly dropped all three ads last week after
the newspaper's owner learned about them.
In conversations
prompted by the appearance of the gender-selection ads, many Indian and South
Asian immigrants also said that traditional bias against female children ran
deep. In India, it is responsible for a widening gender gap, with the number
of girls per 1,000 boys dropping to 927 from 962 in just 20 years.
But while many people in India are trying to stamp out the tradition, the immigrants
said, the openness of the American medical marketplace could help prolong it.
"As immigrants, we really had a chance of starting
with a clean, fresh slate," said Shamita Das Dasgupta, a founder of Manavi,
a New Jersey group that provides counseling for abused South Asian women. "But
we also know that's not possible because we bring our own baggage with us.
"So
it makes me scared when something like this happens with impunity, where people
are saying, `We are offering a service the community will practice anyway,'
" Dr. Das Dasgupta added. "These practitioners are taking advantage
of a practice that is totally misogynous, and unless the good-thinking people
of our community stand up and let their voices be heard, such practices will
continue happening."
In many cultures, a boy is particularly
valued as a breadwinner who will support his parents in their old age; often
only a son can inherit property. A girl is seen as a burden who requires a costly
dowry when she marries. The attitudes are so deeply ingrained that they often
persist after immigration.
There is no sign yet that Indian
immigrants seeking male children are flocking to the American companies that
offer sex-selection procedures, which work on the assumption that sperm carrying
the male chromosome can be separated before insemination from those carrying
the female chromosome.
But doctors at clinics in the New
York City area said that Indian immigrants, as well as immigrants from elsewhere
in Asia, made up a fast-growing part of their clientele.
"The
ethnic groups that are moving in from the Asian subcontinent and China
have a tradition of wanting boys," said Dr. Andrew Y. Silverman,
the medical director of gender-selection centers in Manhattan and White Plains.
"Just from my own patient population, I'm seeing an increase in those kinds
of patients. That's why I started advertising in India Abroad.
" He
said he performed four or five procedures a month at his Ericsson Method Centers,
named for Ronald J. Ericsson, who developed a sperm- separation technique 25
years ago and has licensed its use nationwide.
Dr. Masood
Khatamee, the executive director of the Fertility Research Foundation, said
he also decided to advertise in India Abroad because he had seen an increase
in the number of Indian clients coming to him for gender selection or, as he
put it, "family balancing."
"I have not
really put any ads anywhere before except in New Yorker magazine," said
Dr. Khatamee, who is a professor in the obstetrics and gynecology department
at the New York University School of Medicine. "I don't know now if I did
the right thing or the wrong thing."
The cost for
each insemination is $1,000 to $1,500, but neither Dr. Silverman nor Dr. Khatamee
guarantees that a woman will conceive. And of those who do conceive, they said,
about three out of four will achieve the desired results.
Because
such gender-selection methods do not always give the hoped-for results, the
possibility exists that a desperate or especially determined woman may abort
the fetus if it is not of the gender she wanted. Dr. Khatamee said he tried
to screen his patients to avoid people who would go to such lengths to get the
desired boy or girl.
"If I feel that a couple would
be using abortion as a way of making this a 100 percent technique," he
said, "I'd say no."
The third company that has
been advertising in newspapers for Indian immigrants in the United States and
Canada is Urobiologics Inc. in Livonia, Mich. It promised in its ads to determine
the sex of a fetus as early as five weeks after conception by testing the pregnant
woman's urine, a claim dismissed as implausible by several medical specialists.
Conventional ultrasound tests can sometimes detect the
sex of a fetus after 12 weeks.
Kuldeep C. Verma, the Indian
immigrant who owns Urobiologics, said he did not want to know why his clients
were in a hurry to have such information or whether they intended to abort a
fetus that was not the sex they wanted.
"It is their
decision," Mr. Verma said in a telephone interview.
Mr.
Verma, who said he was a biochemist and developed his sex- determination test
in India before emigrating in 1987, requires each client to sign an agreement
stating that she wants the information only "for family fun."
India
Abroad has decided not to accept any more ads from Urobiologics or sex-selection
clinics.
"We all felt a little queasy," said
Ajit Balakrishnan, the chairman of Rediff.com India Ltd., which bought the English-language
newspaper two months ago. "We don't want to be remotely associated with
anybody that discriminates for a boy child over a girl child. It's wrong to
discriminate. You know, some years ago many of my friends marched through Delhi
and Bombay to get the government to get rid of these tests."
Mr.
Balakrishnan said the paper had a circulation of about 65,000 in the United
States and Canada.
In India, recently released census
figures suggested that female fetuses were being regularly aborted despite efforts
to restrict access to prenatal tests.
Enforcement of a
1994 law against sex-determination tests is feeble and abortions are virtually
unregulated. The tests have become commonplace, with itinerant radiologists
traveling the countryside from clinic to clinic with their compact ultrasound
machines.
The desire for boys, experts said, cuts across
lines of wealth and class and may have intensified with a trend in India, and
among immigrants to the United States, toward having smaller families.
It
is not possible to assess how popular sex-determination tests and gender-selection
techniques might be among Indian-Americans or any other group. There are no
official statistics, and people who wish to choose the sex of their child do
not wish to discuss it publicly, according to Drs. Silverman and Khatamee.
But
Indians are not the only immigrant group to be offered sex-selection procedures
so directly. Chinese immigrants in New York City can find a gender-selection
clinic right in Manhattan's Chinatown, where Dr. Robert M. Nyein started offering
the Ericsson sperm-separation technique as part of his gynecological practice
about four years ago.
Nearly all the Chinese immigrants
who come to him, said Dr. Nyein, want boys.
He has installed
a small sign outside his clinic that says, in Chinese, "You can select
to have a boy or a girl before pregnancy." It is illuminated at night.
That is as far as Dr. Nyein is willing to go to promote the procedure.
"I
thought of advertising in the papers," he said, "but I was afraid
it would turn out to be too controversial with the religious people and such."
China, like India, has a long tradition of favoring male
children, a tradition that has been exacerbated by the country's current one-child
policy. Last year, however, Hong Kong, which has its own legislature, banned
sex selection except when parents want to prevent the transmission of certain
hereditary diseases.
Counselors who work with South Asian
families said that whether it comes from family or culture or personal desire,
the pressure on immigrant couples to have at least one male child is as intense
here as in their native countries.
"I find so many
people crying and saying, `This is the second child and it's also a girl and
now I'll have a big problem,' " said Nahar Alam, a Bangladeshi-born counselor
for Andolan, a New York City advocacy group for South Asian women.
"You
hear things anecdotally when there is violence in the home," added Sujata
Warrier, the New York City program director for the State Office for the Prevention
of Domestic Violence. "If the woman has no choice in sexual matters anyway,
and the pressures to have a boy are very high, then the sex-selective process
offers a way out."
Dr. Das Dasgupta said she had
also worked with South Asian women who were victims of domestic violence and
who said that their husbands harassed or abused them over giving birth to girls.
Companies that promise to help such immigrants conceive male children, she added,
only encourage such behavior.
"So maybe today some
newspapers will drop those kinds of ads, but what can prevent them from appearing
again somewhere else?" Dr. Das Dasgupta said. "In this country there
is a free market."
Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company
